Senator Ireti Kingibe has stated that she was never presented with the committee report that reportedly formed the basis for the suspension of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan from the Senate.
Speaking on the matter, Kingibe expressed concern over the process leading to the disciplinary action, emphasizing the importance of transparency, due process, and adherence to parliamentary procedures in the handling of issues involving elected lawmakers.
According to the senator, she did not have access to any official report detailing the findings, recommendations, or evidence that justified the suspension. She noted that members of the legislative chamber should be adequately informed about reports and decisions that have significant implications for fellow lawmakers and the institution as a whole.
Kingibe stressed that legislative actions must be guided by fairness and accountability, adding that the credibility of the Senate depends on strict compliance with established rules. She maintained that all senators deserve the opportunity to review relevant documents before major decisions are taken.
The senator further explained that access to committee reports is essential for informed decision-making and meaningful participation in debates concerning disciplinary measures. She argued that lawmakers should be fully aware of the facts surrounding any case before endorsing actions that could affect the representation of constituents.
Her remarks have added a new dimension to discussions surrounding the suspension, with political observers and stakeholders calling for greater clarity regarding the procedures that were followed. The development has also sparked renewed debate about internal Senate processes and the need to strengthen mechanisms that promote openness and institutional integrity.
Meanwhile, supporters of legislative reforms have urged the Senate leadership to ensure that all disciplinary proceedings are conducted in a manner that upholds democratic principles and protects the rights of members while preserving order within the chamber.
As reactions continue to emerge, attention remains focused on whether additional details concerning the report and the circumstances surrounding the suspension will be made available to lawmakers and the public. The issue is expected to remain a subject of political and legislative discussion in the coming days.